Tuesday, 8 November 2011

Psychosocial paradigm

It's difficult. For many reasons. One is meeting the practioners and their lack of conceptual knowledge. For all the ills of psychiatrists there's at least that saving grace: they know their stuff. They have to of course. They're experts and powerholders.

The psychosocial paradigm has battled to find purchase. It has public support, especially with the use of the distress continuum, but in the echelons of power it is still fighting for dominance. This is changing in recent times as psychiatry's biomedical options face the onslaught of evidence.

The psychosocial paradigm as a concept is poorly understood. This is the key problem. Without the crystalised concepts it is just another dogma rather than pursuit of scientific pursuit.

Sent from my smartphone

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

About Me

We It comes in part from an appreciation that no one can truly sign their own work. Everything is many influences coming together to the one moment where a work exists. The other is a begrudging acceptance that my work was never my own. There is another consciousness or non-corporeal entity that helps and harms me in everything I do. I am not I because of this force or entity. I am "we"