http://psychiatryandhistory.blogspot.com/2009/05/waterboarding-as-psychotherapy.html
"
While we are properly horrified to learn about the use of deliberate near-drowning (waterboarding) as an interrogation technique, it is worth noting that for a period of nearly two hundred years the same procedure was regarded as a form of psychotherapy. The influential seventeenth century physician Jan Baptiste Van Helmont (1580-1644), originated this treatment after observing that a madman, who was revived following an accidental near-drowning, was relieved of his mental symptoms. The most influential eighteenth century physican Hermann Boerhaave. (1668-1738) mentions the use of submersion in the treatment of insanity but recommends it for only the most desperate cases. Boerhaave's student Jerome Gaub also discusses the treatment and attributes its efficacy to anxiety. "The most deeply seated mental defects and the most incurable forms of madness" he writes, "may sometimes be rooted out by anxiety." Perhaps, he speculates, this is "because the tormented and frightened mind is revived by the terrible punishment of her greatly depressed senses…." He cites "men with minds held captive by the violence of love or grief," who recovered their soundness of mind when revived after accidental near-drowning. He insists that the cause of this recovery is the "frightful torment that near loss of life from suffocation inflicts on the mind." Gaub acknowledges that "submersion therapy" is "a terrible remedy" but adds that it is "one hardly to be exceed in efficacy." Gaub took the trouble to attempt a medical explanation of "submersion therapy." He argued that "submersion therapy" worked by provoking anxiety, which he understood as a powerful emotion caused by bodily changes. The most frequent cause of anxiety, he felt, is interference with respiration, which hinders the passage of blood through the lungs and thus places life in jeopardy. These bodily events affect the "common sensorium" [where mind and body meet] so as to excite ideas in the mind that cannot be contemplated without horror and cannot be dispelled. The value of such shock therapy was widely recognized in the eighteenth century. "In mania," a Montpellier doctor wrote in Diderot and D'Alembert's encyclopédie, "therapy is directed to the body, in which it aims to produce a shock and a deep disturbance ." Such ideas even influenced Philippe Pinel, who cites Van Helmont. Although Pinel did not use "submersion therapy," he did include the role of powerful emotions like fear in dispelling fixed ideas as a component of his moral therapy.
"
Saturday, 17 April 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(1162)
-
▼
April
(42)
- What the mental health system looked like 200 year...
- Lunacy is a myth
- Social ugliness or mental illness?
- Feel your bum
- Isolation and better outcomes for mental illness
- The hippocratic oath
- A good example of what the grass roots movement ca...
- A way to deal with anger
- Criticising the critic and anti-antipsychotic evid...
- My state of consciousness shifts again
- A brief thought summary on the meaning of mental i...
- A ramble on language, concepts and words, psychosi...
- Where have all the bloody teaspoons gone? research
- Violence and schizophrenia - some science and some...
- My opinion on changing language to change stigma
- Legal and illegal drugs in healthcare
- LSD for mental health research makes a come back.
- Waterboarding as psychotherapy
- The power of images
- Government's aspirations for incapacity benefit
- A short positive story from my life
- Peace breaks out!
- Comments on a talk about religon, demographics and...
- How much research is indexed by Google Scholar wit...
- Mildly amusing research on the word "mate"
- Schizophrenia Annual Evidence Update 2010
- The need for progress
- A brief, insightful and amusing paraody of mental ...
- A study I haven't enjoyed reading showing loss of ...
- An extraordinary result about untreated depression.
- Depression ramble
- The Work Capability Assesssment
- Suicide in Japan
- The new 10 commandments
- Miaow Miaow
- A ramble on the biopsychosocial model, the future ...
- Fools, risks and what it is to be human
- A useful academic paper on the distinction between...
- A hope from the future from the trends of the past
- Was Jesus mad?
- Victory for science, freedom of speech and in a wa...
- Why do suicidal thoughts happen?
-
▼
April
(42)
About Me
- we
- We It comes in part from an appreciation that no one can truly sign their own work. Everything is many influences coming together to the one moment where a work exists. The other is a begrudging acceptance that my work was never my own. There is another consciousness or non-corporeal entity that helps and harms me in everything I do. I am not I because of this force or entity. I am "we"
No comments:
Post a Comment