This is probably the worst thing to say to a woman in bed. I've only said it once.
Oh god she deserved it though. I remember just getting so bored of her poor sexual skills. I'm not great in bed myself. Just not enough practice. But I make an effort and I always want a woman to climax. She on the other hand was...well....lazy. Never made the effort. I think she thought sex was just fucking or something. Her idea of foreplay was what a man did.
I admit a degree of anger but more frustration. I suppose it's just a lack of my communication skills.
But I wonder what she told other people? I wonder if she told any of her female friends about what I'd said. I never told her she was crap in bed so she'd have thought "Go on. Finish yourself of" was said out of male
laziness or something.
There's a time when a girl I loved who was a friend of hers looked at me awry when I made a joke along the lines of "Go on. You can finish this one off yourself" referring to a joke I couldn't be bothered finishing. Now she may have looked at me funny because she was amused by an off the cuff comment that made innuendo out of a normal phrase that could be mentioned in the office, or perhaps my ex-loved one had told this person what I'd said.
There's this thing called Theory of the Mind. It's interpretation of people's intentions often based on little gestures. Apparently schizophrenics have poor ToM. I stay away from attempting to interpret these little tells because they're not explicit. I'd like to ask the person I joked with but whose reaction to the joke I couldn't interpret but I don't trust her and she doesn't value me.
It's a shame because I'd like to know. Really just for a blog piece about a "How good are you in bed?" mobile phone application of the future. It's relevant because gossip becomes formalised using this sort
of application. Imagine people could rate their partners and other people could access these. After all, we can rate companies and products. Why not public ratings of people once the technology matures?
Monday, 6 December 2010
Go on. You can finish this one of yourself
Labels:
freedom of information,
love,
mental health,
psychosis,
ratings,
sex,
technology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(1162)
-
▼
December
(103)
- An unusual thing just happened. What may or may no...
- Unshared perceptions update
- Evidence in mental healthcare
- Humour and mental health research
- Let wisdom guide? Let them suck on my chocolate sa...
- Once again another ramble on medicine, mental heal...
- What point is there in any other perspective apart...
- Roadmap of mental health research
- Sham ECT: the new best treatment
- Biastophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Paywalling as a way to protect the power based of ...
- Long Live the Web: A Call for Continued Open Stand...
- Location-based mobile marketing becomes a reality
- More about masturbation and fantasy than I ever th...
- Having half a brain ain't so bad
- The future of input technology
- If schizophrenia is a brain illness why isn't it d...
- What is experiencing god called?
- A quote from CS Lewis that has a lot of relevance ...
- The High-k Solution - IEEE Spectrum
- Guide to buying a cheap smartphone
- Molten-AlloyDriven Self-Assembly for Nano and Micr...
- How to unlock a T-Mobile G1 for free
- A quote from a film that speaks more than words th...
- Permanent digital overlay and physicality and doub...
- really useful book on the optics of the human eye
- Diversity and mental illness (and learning difficu...
- The game layer on top of the world | GadgetGybe (a...
- Was Time to Change the biggest marketing promotion...
- Augmented Reality Marketing In 2010 And Beyond
- I'm really please to know that Jacqui Dillon has a...
- Title of recent review of literature by John Read ...
- Just be glad...
- An essential website for navigating business lingo
- Self-identity and diagnosis
- So some of this early years shit the government's ...
- Video Vault Now Live... | Hidden Creative
- A little on the 3D printer
- Research methodology and looking for alternative c...
- If a behavioural and emotional disorder or class o...
- Neurobiological and psychological effects of exhau...
- Mobile phones applications and charities
- A great quote on Civilisation
- affquake - Google Search
- A right to die?
- Extraordinary pricing for 3D printers
- List of all big technology events this year
- Geo-SEO
- An example of taking a positive from severe mental...
- Fucking irritating Facebook
- Amisulpride in low doses treats depression by incr...
- Totally nucking futs - a printer that prints itself
- I'm a cunt
- Comparison of Two Pharmacological Treatments of Pe...
- How many dual diagnosis patients does it take to c...
- This is an ace video
- Society doctors
- Is modern life a cause of mental illness?
- The risks of social media and people power
- The Three Musketeers and idealism in organisationa...
- The cake scene from Brass Eye
- A lot of information on mental augmentation.
- The problem with the Human Rights Act. It gives no...
- Important legal case information on Deprivation of...
- Am I the only one who's somewhat worried that the ...
- Zyprexa counterfeits, the placebo effect and what'...
- Hardcore porn for SEO nuts
- Technology, social disability, transhumanism and h...
- Important though on new Articulated Naturality app...
- Go on. You can finish this one of yourself
- Molecular Psychiatry - Dopaminergic polymorphisms ...
- This is some fucking interesting shit man
- Link to MIT affective computing research papers
- All-cause mortality among people with serious ment...
- A Systematic Review of Mortality in Schizophrenia
- Links to MIT work on affective computing
- Compared the Equalities Act to the laws on Affirma...
- How new computer games make madness normal
- 3D movies and games development takes a step into ...
- Link to resources for alternative treatment of sch...
- Another amazing optical illusion
- Two reports on the mobile technology industry
- Automatic gift suggestion
- Daft Punk: The movie
- One of my favourite quotes and one of the hardest ...
- UK finally gets a taste of AR
- Great quotes on design
- The etymology of compersion
- European Space Agency is building advanced GPs net...
- Options for better antipsychotics from cannabis
- I wonder if they'll ever invent CBT for the god de...
- Free and augmented reality
- Some useful information on psychopaths
- A little on genetic science.
- A bit about my personal experience
- China leads the world in mobile banking
- Business and AR
- Is it because I is black?
- Skeptics get it wrong on heartbeat location detection
- The Gartner hype cycle
-
▼
December
(103)
About Me
- we
- We It comes in part from an appreciation that no one can truly sign their own work. Everything is many influences coming together to the one moment where a work exists. The other is a begrudging acceptance that my work was never my own. There is another consciousness or non-corporeal entity that helps and harms me in everything I do. I am not I because of this force or entity. I am "we"
Why is that the worst thing to say to a woman? Seems a perfectly reasonable suggestion to me.
ReplyDeleteBesides - it's more fun with an audience... ;-p
You're far, far more liberated than most Rubyintheboudoir. So many women are still trapped in prudish Victorian sexual values. The seem to have ignored the huge sexual liberation movement in the 1970s.
ReplyDeleteThat may be true, but sometimes I wonder if the sexual liberation movement didn't create its own pressure. From a time when sex was saved for marriage and nice girls simply didn't talk about that 'kind of thing', suddenly women were expected to be sexually adventurous, multi-orgasmic and ultra-liberated and if you didn't espouse to the women's glossy magazine ideal of Having The Perfect Orgasm, you risked being labelled frigid or a prude. Sex just became another commodity, another lifestyle aspiration, much as home improvement and cooking is today. As Victoria Wood once joked 'Cosmopolitan shows you how to have an orgasm, Good Housekeeping shows you how to knit one.'
ReplyDeleteIt's what I call 'the tyranny of the orgasm' - just because you can have one doesn't mean you must claim your right to it every single time. The pressure that this creates for both women and men is immense. For me, true sexual liberation can only occur when everyone takes personal responsibility for their own sexual experience, their own satisfaction, their own sexuality and their expression of it. When men and women remove the end-goal of orgasm, we are liberated to find multiple expressions of pleasure and ecstasy. What's more important - having an orgasm or having the most delicious, erotic and enjoyable time possible? Let's not forget - sex is not supposed to be hard work, something to strive for. It's meant to be bloody good fun.
Oh yes - and nothing wrong with a bit of Victorian repression now and then. Nothing is as likely to guarantee an orgasm as being told you can't have one. Now - where's that chastity belt..?