Wednesday, 5 May 2010

What did psychiatric research look like a century ago?

I don't even know where to begin with this abstract I've just come
across. I wish I could read the paper.

*Eddison, E. 1935, *Depression: Normal and Abnormal, Jounal of Mental
Science.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/abstract/81/333/370?maxtoshow=&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=crying&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT
<http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/abstract/81/333/370?maxtoshow=&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=crying&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT>

I'm not even fit to comment on it. Here's the abstract verbatim. There's
lots of opportunity for ridicule but I think that's a weakness in
myself. This would have been the best science of the day. I think there
seems to be the influence of Freud's ideas here which was the fashion at
the time but I could be wrong. I don't know much about Freud.

There's merriment in this paper for the snooty but there's wisdom too.
Its just above my current level.

"

1. The stimulus-free state is rejected as a goal.^
2. Individual^ organisms in an organized group exhibit as a whole^
the same^ adhesive tendency which their component cells share^
in common^ (Trotter).^
3. The primary group is the mother and child who,^ from the point^
of view of the child, form one organism.^
4. The^ child is happy when its union with its mother is not
disputed.^ Its troubles begin when the mother puts it down or
something^ goes wrong with breast-feeding. Union with the mother
represents^ pleasure and continuity of the cell-mass. Tearing the
child^ from its mother constitutes pain and a wound in the
cell-mass^ of which both form a part. At first the mother and
later the^ father are instrumental in causing pain.^
5. Weaning assumes traumatic^ importance, and the wound caused by^
such a painful excision^ can only be healed, in the case of a^
boy, by obtaining a mother^ substitute. In marriage the twain^
shall become one flesh.^
6. Depression^ and hate are aroused whenever pain is produced.
Both^ occur normally^ at weaning, and again at the anal stage.
The^ education of the^ sphincters, forcing the child again to
part^ with what it regards^ as a portion of itself, reopens the
wound^ of weaning.^
7. Normal^ grief in adult life represents a regression to the oral^
stage.^ Without grief and its regression, healing of the
reopened^ wound^ is not possible. When a loved one is lost,
re-adjustment^ is^ only possible by starting again at the
beginning, at the^ oral^ stage. This is seen also in physical
disease when a placebo^ is demanded in order to heal the external
wound (disease) in^ the ego. The meaning of the oral approach in
love-making and^ the function of the kiss become apparent. The
completeness of^ the regression is sometimes shown by involuntary
movements of^ the buccal muscles accompanying kisses.^
8. In response to an^ external danger the source of the threat is^
invested with hate,^ while the external defensive barrier is^
reinforced by apprehension.^ Similarly, with regard to a threat^
from within, anxiety reinforces^ the internal barrier.^
9. Melancholic grief originates from fixation^ at the oral stage.^
10. Normal grief represents regression to the^ oral stage, at which^
*crying* is a natural reaction to separation^ from the mother
or^ to other injuries.^
11. The anxiety which precedes^ the melancholic attack reinforces^
the barrier against stimuli^ from within. The melancholic
attack^ follows rupture of the internal^ barrier. Attempts at
transference^ fail and the wound of weaning^ is reopened. The
self-reproaches^ are directed against the mother^ who, once an
external threat,^ is now, through introjection,^ an internal
threat.^
12. With regard to the Oedipus situation, a^ man heals the wound of^
weaning by choosing a mother-substitute^ and so retains his
mother.^ It is suggested that in the case^ of a girl primary
masochism^ prompts her to invite the injury^ of weaning or,
rather, the^ reopening of the wound. She thereupon^ identifies
herself with^ the lost love-object, i.e. her mother,^ by a
melancholia-like^ reaction. This is supported by the idea,once
common among unmarried^ women, that marriage involves some^
vague, undefined suffering.^

"

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

About Me

We It comes in part from an appreciation that no one can truly sign their own work. Everything is many influences coming together to the one moment where a work exists. The other is a begrudging acceptance that my work was never my own. There is another consciousness or non-corporeal entity that helps and harms me in everything I do. I am not I because of this force or entity. I am "we"