This post comes from something I saw on Facebook. People were worried about the effects of psychotropic medication when used in pregnancy.
There's a bizarre finding that SSRIs that have washed into the water supply are affecting shrimp. The shrimp were found to be going to shallow waters where they'd be eaten quicker. The amount of SSRI must have been tiny which is what surprised me about the result but it made me think of the possibility that there may be an effect on the foetus.
Of course psychiatrists have thought about this too. I did a search on pregnancy and SSRI. I didn't use Google Scholar because I wanted to get this done quick rather than reading through the studies and finding the truth for myself. It's worth doing as I found in my research on clozapine.
The first link points to little to no serious risk to the foetus though there may be problems with withdrawal if antidepressants are used late in the pregnancy. According to this review there is no risk of malformed babies. The behavioural risks are far greater.
http://priory.com/psych/adspregnancy.htm
The second link is to a BMJ article fromn 2006 which says there may be a risk of malformed babies.
http://www.bmj.com/content/333/7573/824.5.full
"
“Our data indicate a moderately increased risk of congenital malformations associated with prenatal exposure to SSRIs,” write the authors, from Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. “Further studies are needed to confirm this risk and to clarify whether the risk is attributable to the drugs themselves, to underlying psychiatric disease, or to other confounding factors.”
"
The third link says there's no risk and has lots of information. It was published in 1995. It categorically states there's no risk from paroxentine.
http://www.antidepressantsfacts.com/review-pregnancy-ssri.htm
The fourth link is from the BBC and was put online in 2009. It cites information from the Danish study but it also has new information.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8273350.stm
"
In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about the SSRI paroxetine because of an increase in birth defects if it was taken during pregnancy.
"
The fifth links has some useful analysis on the problem of working out if it's the SSRI or depression that causes the small increases in birth defects. It also subtly makes the point that a lot of the research is funded by pharmaceutical companies.
http://psychiatry.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2007/627/1
The Mayo Clinic is one of the best sites for health information. It's the sixth link so I've bothered to check it out. A doctor would probably choose to looked at the priory.com link, the BMJ link or the Mayo Clinic one. It's my personal favourite and shows how doctors attempt to weigh the pros and cons. Sadly they may not always get it right. There is a risk with some antidepressants which is well established and risks with others that aren't well established or replicated and in the absence of confirmation it seems the SSRIs and tricyclics will continue to be used.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/antidepressants/DN00007
Their conclusion is a good summary.
"
If you have depression and are pregnant or thinking about getting pregnant, consult your health care provider. Sometimes mild depression can be managed with psychotherapy, including counseling or other therapies. If your depression is severe or you have a recent history of depression, the risk of relapse may be greater than the risks associated with antidepressants.
Deciding how to treat your depression during pregnancy won't be easy. The risks and benefits of taking medication during pregnancy must be weighed carefully on a case-by-case basis. Work with your health care provider to make an informed choice that gives you — and your baby — the best chance for long-term health.
"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(1162)
-
▼
September
(87)
- Cogito ergo sum and alternative experiences of con...
- A good article on antipsychotics and their increas...
- An interesting criticism of the meta-analyses that...
- A quote about street photography
- A great link on street photography
- Tired of life
- The Daily Mail: The paper that's racist so you don...
- The roughest life
- social exclusion and madness
- Anyway by Mother Theresa
- A short update
- Why don't some people like some psychiatric medica...
- A note on how the UK seems to be missing out on pr...
- Psychiatry is still a very basic science
- The problem of mental illness
- An alternative approach to ADHD in children
- What if...
- What the fuck? Depression's happening earlier? (a ...
- Anorexia in Hong Kong and bipolar in the UK
- The problem with determining cause and effect
- A random paper I'd like to spend more time reading...
- Depression: mental illness or not?
- Another paper on schizophrenia and communication
- There are somethings you should never stop doing
- The good thing about pessimism
- Thoughts on debt from personal experience
- Being used to irrationality
- I wish
- Science in direct marketing
- The definition of schizophrenia is atheist
- Injustice for all
- Does stuff like this just happen in mental health ...
- What's the real need at the moment for people with...
- 3 good quotes
- 3 good quotes
- A quote that's hard to live by
- A quote on the acceptance of madness as normal as ...
- A schizophrenia joke
- Register of All-Party Groups for campaigns
- Personal attributional style and mental health mea...
- The book where the original 1 in 4 figure comes from
- Biomarkers for depression
- What to do when my jug is empty?
- The Parity Act in the US and travel insurance in t...
- A cracking blog post exposing the problems of usin...
- Brain grey matter changes in psychosis
- A startling case of hearing voices diagnosing cancer
- Bibliography of hearing voices research on Guardia...
- Where's the wanker?
- A good article by Frances Allen on chilhood bipola...
- More thoughts on suicide
- A ramble on cmotionally lability and fighter planes
- A bit on suicide and me
- Compliance - a fascinating word
- A surprising result on antipsychotic polypharmacy
- Fuck. REsearch I didn't need to read about tonight.
- Thoughts on fleeting thoughts of wanting to not ex...
- Regulation of unregulated psychotherapies
- A status update by Rufus May
- A tragic ode to madnes
- The right to freedom from torture and psychiatric ...
- The mad and their similarity to the Indian untouch...
- Thoughts on marriage
- The most famous song mentioning suicide
- Monetary democracy and the lack of the mad pound
- Credit firms look to exploit those with low financ...
- Lazy kids become lazy adults. Bollocks.
- I don't how to deal with you
- Fuck off. I don't have time to deal with your unha...
- And who is the national celebrity for antisocial p...
- Celebrity credibility
- It's not an illness but the disability exists
- How many alcoholic, homeless men have given up on ...
- I wish there was such a thing as a mental health h...
- The Scientology saga continues
- Antidepressants during pregnancy and the potential...
- A great article from the New York Times that goes ...
- Physicians oath
- The difference between distress and disorder
- The exclusion of grief from depression as an examp...
- Did I just do the most amazing job application?
- Should an employer make an employee take antidepre...
- Animal rights vs psychiatric rights
- Human rights and incarceration of psychiatric pati...
- Is psychiatry fundamentally against diversity?
- Human rights? Not in mental health.
- Scientology
-
▼
September
(87)
About Me
- we
- We It comes in part from an appreciation that no one can truly sign their own work. Everything is many influences coming together to the one moment where a work exists. The other is a begrudging acceptance that my work was never my own. There is another consciousness or non-corporeal entity that helps and harms me in everything I do. I am not I because of this force or entity. I am "we"
No comments:
Post a Comment